Non-Omniscient Belief as Context-Based Resoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper describes a general framework for the formalization of monotonic reasoning about belief in a multiagent environment. The agents* beliefs are modeled as logical theories. The reasoning about their beliefs is formalized in still another theory, which we call the theory of the computer. The framework is used to model non-omniscient belief and shown to have many advantages. For instance, it allows for an exhaustive classification of the "basic" forms of non logical omniscience and for their "composi-tion" into the structure of the system modeling multiagent omniscient belief. 1 The approach This paper describes a general framework for the formal-ization of monotonic reasoning about belief in a multia-gent environment. The most common solution is to take a first order (propositional) theory, to extend it using a set of modal operators, and to take as meaning that an agent believes A (see for instance [Halpern and Moses, 1985]). There is only one theory of the world, however this theory proves facts about the agents' beliefs. According to a first interpretation, this theory is taken to model things how they really are. It is therefore a finite (and possibly incomplete) presentation of what is true in the world, and the fact that B i A is a theorem means that it is, in fact, the case that a i believes A. According to another interpretation, this theory is taken to be the perspective that a generic reasoner has of the world. It is therefore a finite presentation of the reasoner's beliefs, and the fact that A is a theorem means that the reasoner believes that believes A. Once one accepts the second interpretation (as we do), a mechanized theory is naturally taken as representing the beliefs of the computer where it is implemented. Moreover, in the case of multiagent belief, a further step is to have, together with the theory of the computer, one theory (at least, see later) for each agent. *Alessandro Cimatti and Kurt Konolige have provided very useful feedback and suggestions. The work at IRST has been done as part of the MAIA project. This paper is a short version of the IRST technical report #9206-03. The theory of the computer plays the same role as the unique theory in the modal logics approach. The agents' theories are the (mental) representations that the computer has of the agents themselves. The computer has beliefs about the beliefs of the …
منابع مشابه
Non Omniscient Intensional Contextual Reasoning for Query-agents in P2P Systems
Given a de-centralized nature of the development of the Semantic Web, there will be an explosion in the number of ontologies in P2P systems. To integrate data from disparate ontologies, we must know the semantic correspondence between their elements. What we argue is the full epistemic independency of peer databases: they can change their ontology and/or extension of their knowledge independent...
متن کاملThe Role of Educational Context in Influencing EFL Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Beliefs
Teachers’ sense of efficacy belief has been introduced as a context-specific construct, but the related literature is not clear on this specificity. This study was an attempt to show how contextual factors influence efficacy beliefs among English language teachers. To this end, thirty Iranian EFL teachers working in both school and private institute contexts were chosen as the participants to r...
متن کاملA Computational Developmental Model of the Implicit False Belief Task
Do children understand that others have mental representations, for instance, mental representations of an object’s location? This understanding, known as a representational Theory of Mind (ToM) has typically been studied using false-belief (FB) tasks. Standard, verbal FB tasks test whether a child can use protagonists’ beliefs to say that they will search for objects where they last saw them. ...
متن کاملFormal Models of Awareness
This special issue on Formal Models of Awareness contains five papers that concentrate on different approaches to the notion of awareness. They include syntactic and semantic approaches to modelling awareness (awareness of formulas as opposed to awareness of semantic objects such as sets of possoble worlds) and an alternative view from the multi-agent systems perspective where awareness is iden...
متن کاملThe Logic of Justified Belief Change, Soft Evidence and Defeasible Knowledge
We present a logic for reasoning about the evidence-based knowledge and beliefs and the evidential dynamics of non-logically-omniscient agents. We do this by adapting key tools and techniques from Dynamic Epistemic Logic, Justification Logic, and Belief Revision so as to provide a lightweight, yet finegrained approach that characterizes well-known epistemic and doxastic attitudes in terms of th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1993